Skip to main content Scroll Top

Emergency Management Professionalisation Scheme

Professional ethics in emergency management

Professional codes of ethics help protect the public, uphold professional standards, and maintain trust in a profession. They provide guidance on ethical behaviour and promote accountability when standards are not met.

As emergency management professionals, members are expected to act in the public interest, use resources responsibly, treat people fairly and without bias, and uphold the reputation of the profession both online and offline. The EMPS Code of Ethics supports ethical decision-making and promotes integrity, accountability, and professionalism across the sector.

Our Code of Ethics

The EMPS Code of Ethics and Standards of Professional Conduct outlines the values, behaviours, and professional standards expected of emergency management practitioners.

FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES

Primacy of life

Primacy of life is the major motivation for emergency management work. Any loss of life is deeply felt within the emergency management community.

Trust

Agencies depend on a high level of trust, not only within crews, teams, units and brigades, but also with key stakeholders. If we are not trusted, we have lost the confidence of those we serve.

Interoperability

Multi-agency, multi-hazard, all of the time capability is the predominant theme in multi-agency operations.

Accountability

We are all accountable to all stakeholders. Accountability builds confidence and trust in our profession.

All EMPS members are required to comply with the Code alongside the policies and values of their employing organisation.

Complaints

Registered and certified EMPS practitioners agree to abide by the Code of Ethics. Concerns about a practitioner’s conduct should be addressed directly where appropriate. If this is not possible or the issue remains unresolved, a formal written complaint can be submitted to AFAC EMPS.

Complaints are assessed to determine whether they involve a potential breach of the Code. Outcomes may include education, advice, suspension, or termination of membership. Anonymous complaints are not accepted.

EMPS can only investigate matters related to the Code of Ethics. Other concerns, such as operational decisions or professional competence, should be directed to the individual’s organisation.